Table vs. Non-Table Vaccine Injuries: What You Need to Know
Understanding how to get compensation for vaccine injuries can be tricky, but it helps to know the difference between "Table" and "Non-Table"...
6 min read
My Vaccine Lawyer's Blog / Vaccines / ADEM vs MS: How Similar Diagnoses Are Handled Differently in Vaccine Injury Claims
Max Muller
:
Jul 9, 2024, 9:47:11 PM
Two diagnoses can look alike in medical records. Under the VICP, they are handled very differently.
ADEM vs MS enters the conversation when neurological symptoms appear after vaccination and involve the brain and spinal cord. The central nervous system shows inflammation. Nerve fibers stop transmitting normal nerve signals. The myelin sheath that protects healthy cells is disrupted. Early charts often list demyelinating disorders because the clinical presentation overlaps.
That overlap is where confusion begins. It is also where claim outcomes start to diverge.
For vaccine injury claims, ADEM vs MS is not a medical debate. It is about symptom onset, how symptoms develop, and whether the record reflects an isolated event or repeated attacks. Those differences control deadlines, evidence review, and compensation.
ADEM and MS are both classified as demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system. Each can involve the spinal cord, brain tissue, or the optic nerve. Each may follow viral infections, certain infections, or vaccination. Early on, they can present with similar symptoms.
Medical records often reference differential diagnosis and diagnostic criteria while physicians order blood tests, review medical history, and assess whether the immune system reacted once or continues to target healthy cells.
That diagnostic process takes time. The legal clock does not.
In Vaccine Injury Compensation Program claims, ADEM and MS appear most often after a limited group of covered vaccines. These patterns recur in public decisions and expert reviews.
Commonly referenced vaccines include:
In many cases, the chart also notes a recent infection, sore throat, or other illness already documented in the medical history, which complicates early attribution.
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis is a rare disease classified as immune mediated encephalomyelitis. It usually presents as a single neurological injury rather than a condition that unfolds over years.
The change is abrupt. Symptoms do not creep in quietly.
Common ADEM symptoms documented in claims include:
ADEM occurs more often in children, though adults can be affected. For most patients, recovery begins within weeks.
Read more about ADEM symptoms as presented by the Cleveland Clinic
A child receives an MMR vaccine. 12 days later, severe neurological symptoms develop. Hospital records document involvement of the brain and spinal cord. Magnetic resonance imaging shows widespread demyelinating lesions. A lumbar puncture reveals inflammatory cerebrospinal fluid with elevated white blood cells. Blood tests rule out other causes. The initial diagnosis reads acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM).
No additional neurological events follow. Improvement continues. Complete recovery occurs over several months.
From a claim perspective, this structure is critical:
In proven ADEM claims, compensation may include:
Public VICP decisions involving ADEM show lump-sum resolutions from $75,000 to $325,000, with higher totals in severe cases or when long-term care is required. Rare cases involving ongoing deficits can exceed those figures.
Read more about how compensation works in vaccine injury claims.
Multiple sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune disease. Unlike ADEM, MS is defined by progression. MS patients experience symptoms that return, shift, or expand over time.
Common MS symptoms include:
Some individuals experience a severe first attack, followed by periods of improvement and later relapse. Environmental factors and genetic predisposition are often discussed in the record as the clinical course evolves.
Read more about MS symptoms as presented by the Mayo Clinic.
An adult receives a Hepatitis B vaccine. Three weeks later, blurred vision develops and resolves. No diagnosis is made. Two years later, new neurological symptoms develop. Repeat MRI shows new lesions in different areas of brain tissue and the spinal cord. The diagnosis becomes multiple sclerosis.
This is where claims often narrow:
Public MS-related VICP decisions show wide ranges. One published case awarded $500,000 plus $3,000,000 for an annuity. Others resolved for $39,000 where evidence was limited or timelines worked against the claim.
VICP records commonly reference:
These findings support the differential diagnosis and establish diagnostic criteria used during claim review.
Because these deadlines can be complicated and are strictly enforced, individuals who believe they may have a claim should seek legal advice as soon as possible.
The date symptoms develop controls eligibility. The initial diagnosis does not pause or restart the clock.
No, neither Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis nor Multiple Sclerosis is listed on the Vaccine Injury Table maintained by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This means claims involving either diagnosis are considered “off-table injuries” under the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).
When an injury is listed on the Vaccine Injury Table, there’s a presumption that the vaccine caused the injury if symptoms appear within a specified timeframe. But for off-table injuries like ADEM and MS:
To pursue compensation for ADEM or MS under the VICP, these steps are essential:
|
Issue |
ADEM |
MS |
|
Injury Structure |
Typically a single, sudden neurological event (e.g., acute onset of symptoms like weakness, vision loss, balance issues), with no recurrence. Claims often show a complete or substantial recovery. |
Involves multiple episodes or gradual symptom evolution over time. Patients often present with relapsing symptoms and develop new neurological issues months or years later. |
|
Symptom Pattern |
Clear onset within 1–3 weeks of vaccination, often followed by hospitalization and confirmed demyelination via MRI or spinal tap. No new symptoms appear after recovery. |
Initial symptoms may be subtle or overlooked, with later relapses or worsening. Diagnosis often happens years after vaccination, making the timeline more complex and disputed. |
|
Deadline Clarity |
The first symptom is usually well-documented shortly after vaccination, which makes the 3-year filing deadline easier to calculate and prove. |
The first neurological sign may be missed or misattributed, especially if diagnosis comes later. Claims are often challenged based on whether they were filed too late. |
|
Evidence Threshold |
Imaging and CSF findings can clearly show an acute immune response consistent with ADEM. Because it is a one-time event, linking it to a vaccine is more straightforward. |
Requires strong evidence that the vaccine caused the first attack, even if MS is diagnosed years later. Must prove the vaccine triggered, not just coincided with, the autoimmune process. |
To understand scale:
Physical therapy commonly costs $75 to $120+ per session.
Occupational therapy often runs $150 to $175 per visit.
Studies cite average MS-related costs near $88,000 per year.
Six months out of work at $1,250 per week equals $32,500 in lost wages before benefits.
When someone contacts My Vaccine Lawyer about ADEM or MS, the review does not start with diagnosis debates. It starts with extraction.
1. Vaccination date
This establishes whether the vaccine is covered under the VICP and anchors every timeline calculation.
2. First documented neurological symptom
Not the worst symptom. Not the diagnosis. The first note where neurological symptoms appear in the record. This can be an ER visit, urgent care note, or primary care entry.
3. Escalation marker
The point where care escalates. Hospital admission. Neurology referral. Magnetic resonance imaging. Lumbar puncture. This is often where demyelinating disorders first appear in writing.
4. Pattern after escalation
Whether the record shows monitoring and recovery or renewed investigation months later. This is where ADEM and MS diverge in claims.
If ADEM or MS appears anywhere in your medical records after a covered vaccine, timing becomes the deciding factor. Claims are evaluated based on when individual symptoms first appeared, not when a diagnosis settled later.
For ADEM patients, records often point to a single neurological event. For MS patients, questions usually center on when symptoms first emerged, how risk factors were documented, and whether the record shows when MS occurs or whether the condition began earlier than expected. In very rare cases, early symptoms are overlooked entirely, even though the injury clock has already started.
Bring your vaccine date and the date your initial symptoms appeared. Whether symptoms developed once or whether they returned over time can change how a claim is reviewed and whether it remains eligible.
Contact My Vaccine Lawyer for a free consultation to determine whether your claim may still fall within the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program window.
Mr. Muller currently devotes the majority of his law practice to aggressively fighting for the victims of unsafe drug and medical device injuries, as well as vaccine injuries and vaccine reactions involving the flu shot, Tdap vaccine, and more. He has handled hundreds of SIRVA injury cases (shoulder injury related to vaccine administration), especially those involving bursitis, tendonitis, frozen shoulder, and rotator cuff tears. Mr. Muller also handles cases where vaccines caused serious nerve injuries such as Guillain-Barre Syndrome. Mr. Muller has recovered millions of dollars in compensation for his clients in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
Understanding how to get compensation for vaccine injuries can be tricky, but it helps to know the difference between "Table" and "Non-Table"...
Allergic reactions to vaccines are extremely rare, but they can range from a mild rash or swelling to life-threatening anaphylaxis.
Guillain-Barré Syndrome life expectancy depends on disease severity, treatment, and the rights vaccine injury patients pursue through legal claims.